They almost never used --no-sao (Sample Adaptive Offset). SAO smooths out artifacts but also destroys fine film grain, making faces look waxy. Part 3: Why "Better" Than RARBG is Easy (2025+) To get better settings than RARBG, you need to fix what they broke while keeping their file size philosophy.
This article dissects the exact settings RARBG used, explains why they worked, and then shows you how to those settings for modern hardware to produce "RARBG-style" files that look better at the same size. Part 1: The RARBG Philosophy (Why they chose x265) Before touching settings, you must understand their workflow. rarbg x265 encoding settings better
RIP RARBG. You taught us that smaller doesn't have to mean worse. Now we know how to do it better. They almost never used --no-sao (Sample Adaptive Offset)
ffmpeg -i "$INPUT" -map 0:v -map 0:a? -map 0:s? -c:v libx265 -preset slow -tune grain -x265-params "crf=23:profile=main10:level=4.1:no-sao=1:aq-mode=3:deblock=-1,-1:psy-rd=2.0:rdoq-level=2:qcomp=0.7" -c:a libopus -b:a 160k -ac 6 -c:a libopus -b:a 96k -ac 2 -c:s copy -movflags +faststart "$OUTPUT" This article dissects the exact settings RARBG used,