FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads]
Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
The tagline "A Sweet and Dangerous Affair" perfectly encapsulates the essence of FHD JUL211. On one hand, the content is undeniably alluring, offering a tantalizing glimpse into a world of forbidden pleasure and desire. The high-definition visuals and expert production values only serve to heighten the sense of immersion, drawing viewers deeper into the fantasy.
The result is a viewing experience that is both intensely personal and universally relatable. Whether you're a seasoned aficionado of adult content or simply looking to explore new horizons, FHD JUL211 offers something for everyone.
In conclusion, FHD JUL211 represents a sweet and dangerous affair that shows no signs of slowing down. With its exclusive partnership with the enigmatic M performer, this studio has created a brand of adult content that is both captivating and thought-provoking.
So, what is it about FHD JUL211 that has captured the hearts and imaginations of so many fans? The answer lies in its unique blend of style, substance, and sensuality. Each production is carefully crafted to showcase the talents of the M Exclusive performer, combining stunning visuals with a keen sense of narrative and emotional depth.
As the world of adult content continues to evolve and mature, it's clear that FHD JUL211 will remain at the forefront of the industry. With a loyal fan base and a reputation for innovation, this studio is poised to continue pushing the boundaries of what is possible in high-definition entertainment.
Whether you're a seasoned fan or simply looking to explore new horizons, FHD JUL211 is undoubtedly worth checking out. Just be prepared for a wild ride that will leave you breathless and wanting more.
In the world of high-definition entertainment, few acronyms have garnered as much attention and intrigue as FHD JUL211. For those in the know, this cryptic code represents a specific brand of adult content that has been making waves in the industry. But what exactly is FHD JUL211, and why has it become synonymous with a sweet and dangerous affair?
Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.