Adele Adelia -
Music producers have analyzed the frequency spectrum of the viral cover. They found that the vocal track contains "formants" (the resonant frequencies of the voice) that do not exist in nature. A professional singer, even one like Ariana Grande or Mariah Carey, produces formants that shift as they move their jaw. Adele Adelia’s formants are static.
Unlike typical YouTube covers filmed in bedrooms or on street corners, this video was different. The visual featured a young woman with ethereal, porcelain features—large, melancholic eyes and dark hair pulled back. The audio, however, was what stopped listeners in their tracks. The voice was a sonic chimera: the devastating lower register of Adele (hence the first name), combined with the floating, ethereal vibrato of Adelia (a name that fans have retroactively associated with a "lost" folk singer). adele adelia
If you have recently stumbled upon the phrase "Adele Adelia," you are likely experiencing one of two things: either you have just watched a video that left you questioning the nature of artificial intelligence, or you have heard a song so hauntingly beautiful that you swore it was a lost demo from a major pop star. Music producers have analyzed the frequency spectrum of
The truth is less important than the reaction. has forced us to ask a question we were not ready for: Does the singer need to be real for the song to be true? Adele Adelia’s formants are static
If you enjoyed this deep dive into the Adele Adelia mystery, share this article with a friend who needs to know the truth behind the voice.
Within 48 hours, the video had amassed millions of views. Comment sections flooded with binary reactions. Half the viewers wrote, "This is the most beautiful voice I have heard in a decade," while the other half screamed, "This is obviously AI. Look at her eyes. She doesn't blink normally." Why does Adele Adelia spark such intense debate? The answer lies in the "Uncanny Valley"—the hypothesis that human replicas that look almost, but not exactly, like real people evoke a sense of unease.
Hello Thom
Serenity System and later Mensys owned eComStation and had an OEM agreement with IBM.
Arca Noae has the ownership of ArcaOS and signed a different OEM agreement with IBM. Both products (ArcaOS and eComStation) are not related in terms of legal relationship with IBM as far as I know.
For what it had been talked informally at events like Warpstock, neither Mensys or Arca Noae had access to OS/2 source code from IBM. They had access to the normal IBM products of that time that provided some source code for drivers like the IBM Device Driver Kit.
The agreements with IBM are confidential between the companies, but what Arca Noae had told us, is that they have permission from IBM to change the binaries of some OS/2 components, like the kernel, in case of being needed. The level of detail or any exceptions to this are unknown to the public because of the private agreements.
But there is also not rule against fully replacing official IBM binaries of the OS with custom made alternatives, there was not a limitation on the OS/2 days and it was not a limitation with eComStation on it’s days.
Regards
4gb max ram WITH PAE! nah sorry a few frames would that ra mu like crazy. i am better off using 64x_hauku, linux or BSD.
> a few frames would that ra mu like crazy
I am not sure what you were trying to say. I can’t untangle that.
This is a 32-bit OS that aside from a few of its own 32-bit binaries mainly runs 16-bit DOS and Win16 ones.
There are a few Linux ports, but they are mostly CLI tools (e.g. `yum`). They don’t need much RAM either.
4GB is a lot. I reviewed ArcaOS and lack of RAM was not a problem.
Saying that, I’d love in-kernel PAE support for lots of apps with 2GB each. That would probably do everything I ever needed.